We really don't see a clone-focused Battle Packs collection like this Obviously it was a welcome repack! It was full of Clone Trooper goodness and It was totally worthy of re-release and sold equally well a full year later.
Reissued it as a general release Battle Packs set in 2007's 30 (77-07) line. (It was one of the greatest exclusives of all time.) In fact, it was so popularĪnd commanded a high secondary market price shortly thereafter that Hasbro We first got this character first in 2006's TSC The Hunt For Grievous Toys R Us exclusive Battle Packs set. To long term collectors, it is a great updated enhancement to the line. Great attempt on this character and while it's nothing earth-shattering Clone Trooper (withĬip-Quad) is a great second attack by Hasbro on an previously released The good news here is that the name doesn't diminish the awesomeness of this figure. The figure inside the packaging and not the naming. Many collectors don't seem to mind, after all, it's all about Generic creates general confusion, but it especially causes confusion for archivists Ever since those hadĮnded, Hasbro prefers to go with the most generic naming convention possibleįor their figures and until they change this protocol, we will just have Why in the world would they name this specialized of a clone trooper as simply "Clone Trooper"? It makes no sense at all. Gunner" instead and it would have were it released in The SagaĬollection or 30 (77-07) lines. This figure should have actuallyīeen entitled "Heavy Gunner Clone Trooper" or "ARC Heavy Did Hasbro have to call this figure “Clone Trooper”? At this point in ourĬollecting tenure, we should be getting more colorfully described namesįor our action figures especially when they are beyond the scope of a
0 kommentar(er)
